Categoriearchief: debunking

>9/11Bedrog: Helderziende recensent

Geplaatst op door

>Het moet gezegd: “debunkers” van alternatieve 9/11-theorieën die een boek weten te recenseren nog vóór dat deze verkrijgbaar is, verdienen een compliment.

Deze eer valt ons aller Billy toe. Gefeliciteerd met de ontdekking van je helderziende vermogens, beste Billy…

Persoonlijk vind ik trouwens het, dankzij een oud CNN-transcript, bevestigde verhaal van ex-transportminister Norman Mineta een stuk interessanter dan Billy en co.:

When faced with former Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta’s testimony — about Cheney’s stand-down order as the plane approached the Pentagon — Defenders of the official story have tried to discredit Mineta by saying that he got his times mixed up.

Specifically, Mineta claims:

“When I got to the White House, it was being evacuated. I met briefly with Richard Clark, a National Security Council staff member, who had no new information. Then the Secret Service escorted me down to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, otherwise known as the PEOC.”

***

I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, “The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to, “The plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the vice president, “Do the orders still stand?” And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”

Defenders of the official myth say that the White House was not being evacuated at the time Mineta said, and that this proves Mineta got his story wrong, and that in fact Cheney wasn’t in the PEOC until later — after the Pentagon was hit. Lees verder op 9/11Blogger.

Dick Cheney wist het…punt 85 en 101…en de beste man blijft maar in herhalingen vallen, als het gaat om leugens over zogenaamde banden tussen Irak en Al Qaeda.

In Nederland houden we zulke leugens trouwens het liefst onder de pet, dus ik zal niet teveel naar Amerika wijzen.

Tot slot nog even, omdat we er straks weer dreigen in te stinken, de recente uitspraken van Brzezinski m.b.t. een pretext aan de vooravond van een oorlog met Iran:

” It would, he suggested, involve “Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks, followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure, then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the US blamed on Iran, culminating in a ‘defensive’ US military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

Naar traditioneel gebruik steunt de VS terreurgroepen in Iran.

Welterusten, minister-president.