>Waar zogenaamde “debunkers”, in het geval van de aanslagen van 9/11, halsstarrig weigeren genoegen te nemen met sterke aanwijzingen en circumstantiële bewijzen voor een false flag, hapt men dan weer wel gretig in het koekje dat de FBI over de miltvuur-aanvallen heeft aangereikt.
Bruce Ivins was de dader, en verder graag uw mond houden, anders komt u te boek te staan als ongeloofwaardig aluhoedje…
Yeah, right. Over circumstantial evidence gesproken….
Laten we eens kijken hoe geloofwaardig de belangrijkste bron inzake Ivins’ “psychose” is: Jean Carol Duley (overigens meerdere malen aangehouden wegens dronken achter het stuur):
(2) So much of the public reporting about Ivins has been devoted to depicting him as a highly unstable psychotic who had been issuing extremely violent threats and who had a violent past. But that depiction has been based almost exclusively on the uncorroborated claims of Jean Carol Duley, a social worker (not a psychiatrist or psychologist) who, as recently as last year, was apparently still in college at Hood College in Frederick, Maryland. Duley’s scrawled handwritten complaint against Ivins, seeking a Protective Order, has served as the basis for much of the reporting regarding Ivins’ mental state, yet it is hardly the model of a competent or authoritative professional. Quite the opposite. Duley herself has a history that, at the very least, raises questions about her credibility. She has a rather lengthy involvement with the courts in Frederick, including two very recent convictions for driving under the influence — one from 2007 and one from 2006 — as well as a complaint filed against her for battery by her ex-husband. Here is Duley’s record from the Maryland Judicial data base:
UPDATE 20 AUGUSTUS 2008: FBI admits it has no case against Ivins